Skip to content

Search the reference

Scientific profiles are awaiting evidence review.

Evaluation of extraction methodologies for PFAS analysis in mascara: a comparative study of SPME and automated µSPE

Quoted values stay tied to the cited study. Empty sections are gaps.

Summary

Method comparison (SPME vs automated micro-SPE) for eight anionic PFAS in mascara, quantified by LC-MS/MS; applied to six mascara products (waterproof and non-waterproof).

Key numbers

Values read from the source tables and checked against the cited page. Shown as printed, without conversion. Selected records, not an exhaustive transcription. 1 values were held for review.

No values published.

Evidence Fitness

direct

Methods (brief)

See the methods section of the source PDF. Measured samples do not represent every product on the market.

Limitations

Values are reported by the authors for their own samples. Censored results and detection limits are as defined in the source. No unit conversions were made.

Provenance notes

DOI 10.1007/s00216-025-05908-x resolved at Crossref; DOI matched in the filed PDF text. Original file: Olomukoro_2025_mascara_PFAS_SPME_uSPE_LCMSMS_AnalBioanalChem.pdf. SHA-256: 8a7be56b17c735d21cef82a07f91dd9cad8ea0aec88a65b64226edfdf883e124. Library folder: papers-mascara.

Wiki pages updated on ingest

Eye makeup (liners, shadows, mascara, brow products, false lash adhesives, lash/eyebrow serums)